International Educational Review

A Bibliometric Review on Realistic Mathematics Education Database Between 2000-2022

Serkan Kaymak 1 * ,
Bagzhan Maksutkan 2,
Furkan Yildiz 3
1 Suleymen Demirel University2 Suleyman Demirel University3 Astana International University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
International Educational Review, Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2023, pp. 25-39
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 1311 DOWNLOADS: 587 Publication date: 15 May 2023
ABSTRACT
Although there is a high demand for approaches to teaching "real mathematics" today, little is known about its current state. To bridge this gap, this research aims to review 506 studies on the transmission of "real mathematics" from the Scopus database between 2000 and 2022This study tackles four issues using descriptive and bibliometric analyses: (i) overall size, growth trajectory, and geographic distribution; (ii) most significant authors and research teams in this subject; and (iii) sources with the most sway in this field (i.e., journals, books, conferences); and (iv) how many of the research papers written for the RME method are focused on the impact of students on their results.
KEYWORDS
bibliometrics, mathematics education, mathematics in context, real mathematics, Scopus.
CITATION (APA)
Kaymak, S., Maksutkan, B., & Yildiz, F. (2023). A Bibliometric Review on Realistic Mathematics Education Database Between 2000-2022. International Educational Review, 1(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.58693/ier.112
REFERENCES
  1. Apsari, R. A., Putri, R. I. I., Abels, M., & Prayitno, S. (2020). Geometry Representation to Develop Algebraic Thinking: A Recommendation for a Pattern Investigation in Pre-Algebra Class. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 45-58.
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
  3. Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. London: HM Stationery Office.
  4. Fauzan, A., & Diana, F. (2020). Learning trajectory for teaching number patterns using RME approach in junior high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1470/1/012019
  5. Ginsburg, H. P., Klein, A., & Starkey, P. (1998). The Development of Children's Mathematical Thinking: Connecting Research with Practice. In W. Damon, I. E. Sigel, & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (pp. 401–476). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  6. Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for research in mathematics education, 22(3), 170-218.
  7. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
  8. Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & education, 73, 26-39.
  9. Niss, M. A. (1996). Goals of Mathematics teaching. In J. A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & Laborde, C. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 49-97). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_2
  10. Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number develop- ment in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 357-379.
  11. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. (pp 9-
  12. 40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Sutarto Hadi (2002). Effective teacher professional development for implementation of Realistic Mathematics in
  14. Indonesia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twenty, Enschede.
  15. Tran, T., Nguyen, C. H., & Nguyen, L. T. M. (2022). Policy and Practice Towards Education 4.0 in Vietnam.
  16. In Educational Innovation in Vietnam (pp. 1-13). Routledge
  17. Vogt, F., Hauser, B., Stebler, R., Rechsteiner, K., & Urech, C. (2020). Learning through play–pedagogy and
  18. learning outcomes in early childhood mathematics. In Innovative Approaches in Early Childhood Mathematics (pp. 127-141). Routledge.
  19. Vuong, Q. H. (2020). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature, 582(7811), 149- 149. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
  20. Widjaja, Y.B. (2002). How realistic approached and microcomputer-based laboratory supported lessons work in Indonesian secondary school classroom [On-line]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  21. Wittmann, E. C. (2005, December 4). Freudenthal 100 symposium: Realistic mathematics education, past and present. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde. https://bit.ly/3q4RouZ
  22. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327-355.
  23. Zulkardi (2002). Developing a 'rich' learning environment on RME for student teachers in Indonesia. To be published in the special edition of the International Journal of the Indonesian Mathematics Society (MIHMI), January 2003.
  24. Zulkardi, Z. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers [Doctoral dissertation], Universiteit Twente.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.